Connecticut · Q2 2026
Northwest Hills Planning Region, Connecticut
0.0% of Northwest Hills Planning Region deposits held by banks under $100B in assets sit in institutions above the regulatory CRE concentration threshold.
Counting institutions that are concentrated but do not meet the growth test, the share is 14%.
Hover or tap a county for its grade.
Banks behind this number
7 banks under $100B in assets with a branch here| Bank | Headquarters | Assets | Status | Criterion | Share of bank deposits here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The National Iron Bank | Salisbury, CT | $0.3B | Below | — | 100.0% |
| The Torrington Savings Bank | Torrington, CT | $1.0B | Below | — | 96.0% |
| Northwest Community Bank | Winsted, CT | $1.3B | Below | — | 56.5% |
| Union Savings Bank | Danbury, CT | $3.3B | Concentrated | 300%+, growth test not met | 21.5% |
| Thomaston Savings Bank | Thomaston, CT | $1.9B | Below | — | 9.6% |
| NBT Bank, National Association | Norwich, NY | $16B | Below | — | 3.2% |
| Webster Bank, National Association | Stamford, CT | $86B | Below | — | 1.2% |
- Salisbury, CT$0.3B—100.0% of bank deposits
- Torrington, CT$1.0B—96.0% of bank deposits
- Winsted, CT$1.3B—56.5% of bank deposits
- Union Savings BankConcentratedDanbury, CT$3.3B300%+, growth test not met21.5% of bank deposits
- Thomaston, CT$1.9B—9.6% of bank deposits
- Norwich, NY$16B—3.2% of bank deposits
- Stamford, CT$86B—1.2% of bank deposits
A bank can meet more than one condition at once, so the county counts above the table add up to more than the number of banks. Each row shows the strongest condition that bank meets.
What this means
None of the 7 banks under $100B in assets with a branch in Northwest Hills Planning Region are above a regulatory CRE concentration threshold this quarter. Another 1 carries commercial real estate above 300% of capital without meeting the three-year growth test, which is why the broader share is 14%.
Coverage is 89%: the rest of the deposits in Northwest Hills Planning Region sit in banks above the $100B threshold, which this report does not evaluate. Concentration is exposure, not loss. A bank above a threshold is one the 2006 interagency guidance expects to hold more capital and document its underwriting, not one that has lost money. We tested whether counties in the top quartile of this score went on to deteriorate faster over the following eight quarters, and found no relationship. The backtest is published in full.
Concentration measures exposure, not loss. This is a map of exposure, not a forecast: our published backtest found no relationship between a county's score and subsequent deterioration.
Nothing on this page is investment advice.