Massachusetts · Q2 2026
Suffolk County, Massachusetts
Banks under $100B in assets hold 2.4% of deposits in Suffolk County. Below 25%, we do not rate a county: CRE exposure here is concentrated in national banks and is not geographically attributable by deposit.
17% of Suffolk County deposits held by banks under $100B in assets sit in institutions above the regulatory CRE concentration threshold.
Hover or tap a county for its grade.
Banks behind this number
20 banks under $100B in assets with a branch here| Bank | Headquarters | Assets | Status | Criterion | Share of bank deposits here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Cooperative Bank | Roslindale, MA | $0.5B | Below | — | 100.0% |
| Commonwealth Co-operative Bank | Hyde Park, MA | $0.2B | Below | — | 100.0% |
| Beacon Bank and Trust | Boston, MA | $22B | Above threshold | C2 | 26.3% |
| Eagle Bank | Everett, MA | $0.7B | Above threshold | C2 | 18.9% |
| Rockland Trust Company | Rockland, MA | $25B | Below | — | 14.6% |
| Eastern Bank | Boston, MA | $31B | Approaching | — | 11.6% |
| East Cambridge Savings Bank | Cambridge, MA | $1.7B | Below | — | 7.4% |
| Dedham Institution for Savings | Dedham, MA | $2.6B | Approaching | — | 5.6% |
| Hingham Institution for Savings | Hingham, MA | $4.6B | Concentrated | 300%+, growth test not met | 5.3% |
| OneUnited Bank | Boston, MA | $0.6B | Concentrated | 300%+, growth test not met | 3.5% |
| Leader Bank, National Association | Arlington, MA | $5.3B | Below | — | 2.5% |
| Webster Bank, National Association | Stamford, CT | $86B | Below | — | 1.9% |
| Salem Five Cents Savings Bank | Salem, MA | $8.8B | Approaching | — | 1.9% |
| Safra National Bank of New York | New York, NY | $16B | Below | — | 1.8% |
| Needham Bank | Needham, MA | $7.4B | Above threshold | C2 | 1.8% |
| Cambridge Savings Bank | Cambridge, MA | $7.0B | Concentrated | 300%+, growth test not met | 1.1% |
| East West Bank | Pasadena, CA | $84B | Below | — | 1.1% |
| Cathay Bank | Los Angeles, CA | $25B | Below | — | 0.6% |
- The Cooperative BankBelowRoslindale, MA$0.5B—100.0% of bank deposits
- Hyde Park, MA$0.2B—100.0% of bank deposits
- Beacon Bank and TrustAbove thresholdBoston, MA$22BC226.3% of bank deposits
- Eagle BankAbove thresholdEverett, MA$0.7BC218.9% of bank deposits
- Rockland, MA$25B—14.6% of bank deposits
- Eastern BankApproachingBoston, MA$31B—11.6% of bank deposits
- Cambridge, MA$1.7B—7.4% of bank deposits
- Dedham Institution for SavingsApproachingDedham, MA$2.6B—5.6% of bank deposits
- Hingham Institution for SavingsConcentratedHingham, MA$4.6B300%+, growth test not met5.3% of bank deposits
- OneUnited BankConcentratedBoston, MA$0.6B300%+, growth test not met3.5% of bank deposits
- Arlington, MA$5.3B—2.5% of bank deposits
- Stamford, CT$86B—1.9% of bank deposits
- Salem Five Cents Savings BankApproachingSalem, MA$8.8B—1.9% of bank deposits
- New York, NY$16B—1.8% of bank deposits
- Needham BankAbove thresholdNeedham, MA$7.4BC21.8% of bank deposits
- Cambridge Savings BankConcentratedCambridge, MA$7.0B300%+, growth test not met1.1% of bank deposits
- East West BankBelowPasadena, CA$84B—1.1% of bank deposits
- Cathay BankBelowLos Angeles, CA$25B—0.6% of bank deposits
A bank can meet more than one condition at once, so the county counts above the table add up to more than the number of banks. Each row shows the strongest condition that bank meets.
What this means
3 of the 20 banks under $100B in assets with a branch in Suffolk County are above a regulatory CRE concentration threshold, and together they hold 17% of the county deposits this report covers. Another 3 carry commercial real estate above 300% of capital without meeting the three-year growth test, which is why the broader share is 19%. 4 more sit within one quarter of a threshold.
Coverage is 2.4%: the rest of the deposits in Suffolk County sit in banks above the $100B threshold, which this report does not evaluate. Concentration is exposure, not loss. A bank above a threshold is one the 2006 interagency guidance expects to hold more capital and document its underwriting, not one that has lost money. We tested whether counties in the top quartile of this score went on to deteriorate faster over the following eight quarters, and found no relationship. The backtest is published in full.
Concentration measures exposure, not loss. This is a map of exposure, not a forecast: our published backtest found no relationship between a county's score and subsequent deterioration.
Nothing on this page is investment advice.